I had a long, quiet drive alone this past weekend and begin to think; to question. This required going back to the beginning - the root of things. If behavior is based upon values, and values upon beliefs, what does that tell me about my current behavior? I've covered values quite a bit in the last week, so needed to go deeper - to beliefs. And therein found my answer. I believe my needs are not being met.
From Part I of this series:
Our needs are what we are pursuing by way of our decisions. Whatever our needs are at any given time, our values will shift to accommodate them and our behavior will immediately reflect to achieve it.
It would appear I'm trying to get my needs met - apparently in the most expeditious way possible. My wife mentioned in a previous session that this had been going on prior to her being diagnosed as bipolar and the subsequent anti-psychotic med shuffle. Assuming that's true, I've been trying to get my needs met for awhile now. Which explains my actions. Some (not all) of my needs are being met by my wife, and some (not all) of my needs are being met by her BFF. And this is why it's messy: Connection can be much more than a personality need - presumably tying into transcendence - contributing to something greater than yourself. I've always considered my relationships just that. But according to Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development, the contrast to intimate, reciprocal relationships is isolation.
I am amazed and grateful that the relationship I have with my wife has been so fulfilling, but given my own personality coupled with how love languages *actually* work, I don't see myself ever not seeking more, either within my existing relationships or completely outside of it. While reevaluation without provocation has been my mantra for over a decade, sometimes provocation can give us the clarity to reexamine our own intrinsic motivations.
When I read up to this point to my wife, she had some brilliant questions, such as, "You mention intrinsic motivations, so with whom does the responsibility lie for getting needs met?" I assured her getting my needs met was solely my responsibility, but that if I am seeking a reciprocal intimate relationship, that is something I cannot accomplish alone, so therefore if that's truly what I desired, it would be my responsibility to find one. Which led me to wonder why we seek at all - surely a wonderful relationship with a partner who checks off 80% of my boxes is a blessing! Especially given my highly specific and selective requirements. So why can't I just shrug my shoulders and be happy with these blessings I have received? Or is that how resentment starts, casting the remaining 20% into deep relief? Some people I've spoken to about such things put a lot of stock in age being the deciding factor, and I can surely see their perspective. My wife believes my ever-present need for connection may be due to trauma, or even lack of trauma, and I can see that perspective too as well as understand how confusing this must be for her at times. And I certainly don't want to lose her over this, but again, why should this be something to which our relationship suffers? Why is everything seemingly a zero-sum game?
I mentioned last session I sometimes struggle with the relationship escalator when emotions intrude upon the logic - I assume, to varying degrees, we all do. So our agreement - my wife and I - is to immediately STOP and reevaluate a relationship decision if one of us becomes uncomfortable, because how else is one supposed to know if something will work or not without first trying it. The relationship escalator provides us that opportunity. My wife wonderfully considered poly on and off for very nearly 10-full years where we discussed it philosophically, emotionally, logically, and theoretically. In fact, she considered it right up until the first time I fell in love. She wanted to pull out. After much discussion and double-checking and, dare I say it, reevaluation, we did just that. We took a step backward on the relationship escalator as we've always promised to do. I think we were both confused by what happened next. I assumed when she said she didn't want to be a poly, she meant she didn't want to practice ethical non-monogamy. But when she said she didn't want to be poly, I think she meant she didn't want me to practice ethical non-monogamy. Not only would that not be covered by the relationship escalator, it might suggest feeling betrayed by my continued communication with her BFF.
Which brings us back to the zero-sum game. Hell, even our therapist asked which I preferred, my wife or her BFF, as if that were somehow a valid question. My wife pulled out the idiomatic proverb, "having your cake and eating it too." Because to her, my affection is an all-or-nothing prospect. I either love her, or I seek my needs being met elsewhere. According to the proverb, it would be unreasonable for me to have both. It's bullshit because it limits so many otherwise wonderful things - as do most societal norms to which we so blindly cling. It limits flexibility, it limits accountability, it limits responsibility, it limits growth, it limits challenges which affect our ability to think critically and problem solve, and above all, it limits love. That's what pains me the most, that love should be this tiny, controlled thing with limited expression. I do sometimes wonder how she reconciles all the freedom of bodily autonomy I allow her to get her needs met in any way she requires with her inability to afford me the same respect. Zero-sum game.
This evening I explained it to her thusly: You keep thinking I'm going to leave you to get my needs met - that will be your choice, not mine. I would choose to have you come with me on any adventure in which I partake.
◾ Tags: