I resolve* to finally dismiss every initiate who thinks if I am speaking 1-degree off point, I must mean the opposite. I will consider them non-combatants on the path to enlightenment.

The elusive monochromatic spectrum
Honest to god shades of gray <-- Not a myth!
* - My first ever :)
◾ Tags:
(no subject)
(no subject)
Will I ever learn?
(no subject)
i like this approach. i've found i just have to walk away when i reach a certain point.
though i definitely don't always succeed either, especially when it's something i'm passionate about.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
jumping to the conclusion that if you do not agree wholeheartedly with the discussion point then you must believe the opposite ~ in an attempt to win the argument rather than trying to understand.
I may ask to borrow it some time. :-)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
For example:
Me: I think marijuana ought to be legalized.
Idiot: And I suppose you think we ought to let murderers out of jail too?
(no subject)
Its a humbling thing knowing I failed.
(no subject)
You, like myself, often mistake being engaged in conversation as COMMUNICATION ~ the desire to exchange information in order to reach mutual understanding. What morons we are. These others have no desire to understand. They are not communicating; they are playing game. Their goal is to win. They fail to understand that by using discussion as a game to win, we all lose.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)