ehowton: (Default)
Did two things this weekend. Played Texas Hold'em, and played Star Trek Elite Force II Holomatch. Notice I didn't sleep? Another few days of no sleep and I'm going to strangle Tony in his.

Had a FANTASTIC time at David and Wendy's playing games. We started the weekend at MAIN EVENT playing Texas Hold'em. Wendy, Tony and myself sat down at a table with about four other people and a rookie dealer. Most of the players there were berating her for her inexperience, but I found her alluring. I probably thought this because she was cute and unsure of herself, which reminded me of my wife. Seriously, when you've been married as long as I have, you don't even look at other women except in the context of how they remind you of your own woman. But I digress. When I went out I joined David for an Elite Force II holomatch. It was at this point that I was going to link holomatch to it's article in Wikipedia, but there isn't one. So I will author that first chance I get, or during one of my stretches of not sleeping. I'd do it now, but I'm a bit of a perfectionist and I'm at work so it would ultimately just frustrate me. Anyway, Tony joined us when they closed his game, and we were up until 0700 gaming.

**Wikipedia article written for 'Holomatch'**

I dealt the tournament the next evening at Dave and Wendy's. My first. There's a whole hell of lot to keep up with in doing so, and I don't know the game nearly as well as Wendy. She knows every course of action for every incident. I accidentally flipped a card up early in the game during it being dealt. I pankied. She didn't. There's a scenario for handling that. Wendy even split the side bets for the poor girl dealing the night before. Wendy rox0rs.

drax0r's recount of the evening can be found here!

Woke up this morning humming "What Would Brian Boitano Do?" from Southpark the movie, which I haven't seen since 1999 I think, so I think this sleep thing is really fecking me up. Started whistling "The Internet is for Porn." from Avenue Q once I got to work though, without any reason why.

If you're working in Windows XP and you right-click 'My Computer' and select 'Properties' you can click the 'Advanced' tab to bring you to performance settings. In the 'Visual Effects' tab you are given 4 options:



Because the 'Luna' interface drains precious system resources, you have the option of turning them all off (if you have a slower system), keeping them all on (if you have a super-fast box with plenty of memory), or picking and choosing with the "Custom" tab (I like "Smooth edges of screen fonts" and "Use drop shadows for icon labels on the desktop"). The 4th option is "Let Windows choose what's best for my computer." I like that. It's a computer, right? It can think faster than we can and perform complex algorithm's in the time it took me to type the word. Here's a fun experiment to try at home. Make that your selection (it's the default) and remove sticks of RAM from you computer one at a time between reboots, checking at each interval to see which system-sapping resources Windows has chosen to disable as you slowly decrease system memory. Isn't it amazing?


Even at the minimum supported processor speed and RAM configuration, Window's 'choice' of visual effects for optimal performace is to turn every single one of them on!


Dumbasses.

◾ Tags:
ehowton: (Default)
I got Star Wars Battlefront today.

Tenative closing on the house today at 1600. If it's pushed back (due once again to the buyers inability to get financing) I'm going to let my agent know that if they cannot procure funding by the 1st (one month since we accepted their offer) then they can either pay my mortgage for the month of July, or I re-list the house sans contract pending. It's good to have a lawyer to advise you of these things.

Tony: I discovered how I ended up looking up the movie Hitch on Wikipedia, and I'm curious as to how you would have handled the same situation. I had Wikipedia up to read about a new Broadway play which had won a Tony (not you, Tony) and the question was posed to me, "What ever happened to DJ Jazzy Jeff? As I was already in Wikipedia I started there and ended up staring at a link to the movie you had purchased the evening before and I wanted to read about it. What would you have done, Tony? You would NEVER use on online encyclopedia to look up movies and anyone who does is doing it wrong. You do NOT cut and paste links into new browser windows because its inefficient. You REFUSE to launch new browser processes. Would your head implode to prevent you from breaking one of your own rules or is the "CTRL-T, imdb.com, Hitch" scenerio your answer despite it's lack of (implied) efficiency?

Shanghai'd from babygirlsmom:

Your Political Profile



Overall: 95% Conservative, 5% Liberal

Social Issues: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

Personal Responsibility: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

Fiscal Issues: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal

Ethics: 75% Conservative, 25% Liberal

Defense and Crime: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal




Well this is kinda bullshit. Two pre-selected choices per question and only twenty questions? I ended up not answering two of them at all! What a bunch of crap. Now what I wouldn't mind seeing is some sort of comprehensive AI-driven algorithm which required a little more thought to increase it's accuracy.

With the right attitude, nothing can stop you!

So the phone rings. I answer it. The lady on the other end asks, "I"m just verfying that you know Frankie McCarver."
"Never heard of him." I reply. There's a long pause.
"Thank you." She says, and hangs up.
◾ Tags:
ehowton: (Default)
From TSS Chat this morning:
ehowton: He springboarded into the conversation fray, so to speak
mrfixit426: i haven't been in a chat room for about 6 years
ehowton: Chat rooms are kinda gay.
mrfixit426: so please excuse me if i'm a bit slow
ehowton: But we all love soundtracks here.
mrfixit426: me too
ehowton: So, I guess one could say, 'Gay happens'

An excerpt from Wikipedia's Teletubbie's Entry:
The Teletubbies' diet seems to consist exclusively of Tubby Custard (which is sucked through a spiral straw bowl) and Tubby Toast (circular toast with a smiley face on it). They are spectacularly messy eaters. Fortunately one of their companions is the Noo-Noo, a sentient, self-propelled vacuum cleaner.

Yes, I drive a Cavalier because I'm compensating for something.
Why do men who drive gigantic trucks get ridiculed for compensating for a small penis, yet men who drive sub-compacts never get accused of having overly-large cocks?

My work Messageboard from this morning:
According to man, fmthard cannot write a VTOC on an unlabeled disk under 1TB. My assumtion is that because these disks are 1TB, a VTOC was written! Therefore, when the disks were labeled they were done so prior to having the partition table layed out. I'm curious how to 'create' partition 2 on a raw device, but I have a few ideas. Will chit-chat with Art and David on getting this RAID group detroyed and rebuilt.

...Later that same day....

The 3 new 1TB SAN disks were labeled without a whole-disk partition (slice 2, backup). fmthard writes partition 2 by default if it's not present but:

fmthard -d 0:0:0x00:0:0 -d 1:0:0x00:0:0 -d 6:0:0x00:0:0 -d 8:0:0x00:0:0 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s2
expected one reserved partition, but found 0

And trying to create it manually returns the same error:

fmthard -d 0:0:0x00:0:0 -d 1:0:0x00:0:0 -d 2:5:0x01:34:2147483581 -d 6:0:0x00:0:0 -d 8:0:0x00:0:0 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s2

But one at a time and we're successful unti partition 8 (which is a misnomer, there are only 7, 0-6. However, these disks start at block 34 and include a partition 8!

bash-2.05# fmthard -d 0:0:0x00:0:0 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s0
bash-2.05# fmthard -d 1:0:0x00:0:0 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s1
bash-2.05# fmthard -d 6:0:0x00:0:0 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s6
bash-2.05# fmthard -d 8:0:0x00:0:0 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s8
fmthard: Cannot stat device /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s8
bash-2.05# fmthard -d 2:5:0x01:34:2147483581 /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s2
fmthard: Partition 8 overlaps partition 2. Overlap is allowed
only on partition on the full disk partition).

Now we can use format normally to produce the following output:

Part Tag Flag First Sector Size Last Sector
0 unassigned wm 0 0 0
1 unassigned wu 0 0 0
2 unassigned wm 0 0 0
3 unassigned wm 0 0 0
4 unassigned wm 0 0 0
5 unassigned wm 0 0 0
6 unassigned wm 0 0 0

However, cannot create partition 2 because of partition 8, as shown on prtvtoc output:

* /dev/rdsk/c2t6d0s2 partition map
*
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 2147483648 sectors
* 2147483581 accessible sectors
*
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
*
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 34 2147467196 2147467229
*
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
8 11 00 2147467230 16384 2147483613

Further investigation reveals that this error on label:

Partition 2 ends at 2147483648
It must be between 34 and 2147483614.
Partition 8 overlaps partition
Warning: error writing EFI.
Label failed.

Might be related to bugid 6237585 "Cannot revert EFI labeled disk back to VTOC" for which there's patch 119374, which is not present on ncgcasm01 (showrev -p | grep 119374), listed on sunsolve HERE This patch requires an immediate reboot of the box after patching. Best guess guys.
Eric <ehowton@ftw.nrcs.usda.gov>
- Tuesday, June 14, 2005 at 11:53:22 (CDT)

UPDATE!
Ok, so partition 8 is a standard Solaris reserved partition. I didn't know that. That being said, I was able to create a whole-disk partition using the first sector of partition 8 as my last sector, and label the disk!
◾ Tags:

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 1213 14
15 16 17 18 19 2021
2223 24 25 26 27 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags