ehowton: (Default)

Because things like "Sci-Fi" (and to a much lesser degree, the recently SMACKDOWN-laden SyFy channel) are mainstream popular, so then are those who consider themselves geeks. When Valley Girls were popular for example, that didn't make you a geek...You were, after all, just following what was popular - much as you are now. Logging into Facebook does not make you a geek either <-- everyone does it.

But I'm not here to argue the denotation and/or societal nuances of geekdom - though believe you me, I could tell you stories, having grown up one. I'll leave those bittersweet tales for later. What I would like to say is DON'T YOU DARE ROLL YOUR EYES AT ME when I mention the score to The Twilight Saga: Eclipse because its an overrated tween vamp movie. Let me explain:

Before Peter Jackson, there were these things called "books" and people would "read" them. The geekier ones read a genre popularly known as "fantasy." Believe it or not, The Lord of the Rings was a trilogy of books long before it was made into a movie and thrust you into geekdom because you enjoyed something mainstream. I'm not discrediting the films - they were magnificent - and I'm not attempting to hold on to a mantle I feel I deserve over someone else either, for as far as I'm concerned, press is great for obscure niches - oh the things I've learned because they were hone from popular culture (I would've never read Vladimir Nabakov's Lolita had it not been for Sting and the Police...)!

One of the things which made The Lord of the Rings trilogy so memorable was its music. The film's "score" or background instrumental music. In this case, the composer of the score for all three films was Howard Shore. His music was so good, in fact, that he won two Academy Awards for Best Original Music Score. This is the same guy who wrote the music to Eclipse. <-- The music doesn't have anything to do with teens, tweens, bored housewives, Robert Pattinson or vampires! Enjoying a grand score by a great composer, is not jumping on a squeeing bandwagon, and when you roll your eyes at the mention of the title, you give yourself away.

So listen, learn, and blend.
◾ Tags:
Date/Time: 2010-09-22 04:49 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] schpydurx.livejournal.com
I can't believe that as a grown man, you'd reverse your earlier position of mocking public schools to defending the necessity of public schools to babysit your kids because you wish to shirk your responsibility, particularly on one page where the entire thread can be seen at a glance. I expected more of you, but then, you wouldn't be the arrogant [livejournal.com profile] ehowton that we've all come to know and love.
Date/Time: 2010-09-22 07:28 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] ehowton.livejournal.com
My arrogance pales in comparison to your gall. You have no children. Your opinion means less than nothing where this is concerned. I look very forward to hearing about your choices and struggles and joys when the time comes, but until then, you'd do well to shut the fuck up, and fast.
(deleted comment)
Date/Time: 2010-09-22 23:22 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] ehowton.livejournal.com
Can you imagine how sharply the quality and choice of primary schools would to improve if they had to fight for our consumer dollars rather than continuing to get money from us even as they fail to produce?

UNTHINKABLE!

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234 5
6 7 8 910 1112
13 14 15 1617 1819
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags