I have not yet seen the movie. I heard it was really good. I heard that it did very well at the box office. I'm getting a lot of 'I told you so.' Its this last part which has me confused. You hedged your bet based on speculation. As did the studio. There was no guarantee for its success.
I heard in the news the reason it did so well at the box office opening weekend was that most people went to see it because Heath Ledger died. I don't understand that. When I see it, it won't be to see some actor who later died. Why is that such a draw? There are no words I can think of to explain it. I'll want to see it because I enjoyed the first one, and I heard that this was a spectacular movie.
You said it was going to do well because it was going to be such a great movie, which, as it turned out, it was. But that's not why it did so well opening weekend. So which is it? And furthermore, how do you justify your answer?
Lastly, because I won't take my son to see The Dark Knight I bought the 1966 original Batman: The Movie I saw in theaters in the late 70s.
He'll probably hate me.

I heard in the news the reason it did so well at the box office opening weekend was that most people went to see it because Heath Ledger died. I don't understand that. When I see it, it won't be to see some actor who later died. Why is that such a draw? There are no words I can think of to explain it. I'll want to see it because I enjoyed the first one, and I heard that this was a spectacular movie.
You said it was going to do well because it was going to be such a great movie, which, as it turned out, it was. But that's not why it did so well opening weekend. So which is it? And furthermore, how do you justify your answer?
Lastly, because I won't take my son to see The Dark Knight I bought the 1966 original Batman: The Movie I saw in theaters in the late 70s.
He'll probably hate me.

(no subject)
TDK is not a fun movie. It's written with a dark and misunderstood nihilistic edge - like someone who saw Fight Club and understood the words without hearing the message.
If you want a fun movie to watch with your son, go and rent The Phantom (1996).
(no subject)
(no subject)
And no, this is not a movie to take the kids to see. It seems to have gotten a PG-13 because the MPAA decided that it was apparent that they weren't going to be able to keep children out (a self-fulfilling prophecy, perhaps).
I'm planning on picking up the '66 Batman on Blu-ray once the smoke from the purchase of the camera clears. I've heard it looks outstanding.
(no subject)
I'm a bit 'old-fashioned' in what I will and will not allow my children to see. My son is very good about this, always checking the ratings on his games before playing them, and calling me if he thinks the "T" rating is unwarranted.
I'm looking forward to watching the film with him. I saw the Blu-ray at the store and it looked phenomenal!
(no subject)
If you're old-fashioned or new-fashioned, this is a movie for adults, not children. There are several very disturbing sequences in it, the issues being more tonal than graphic (although there is some of that as well, especially with respect to Two-Face). It is sort of Heat meets SE7EN, if that helps to explain it (SE7EN actually being a good analogy because much of the violence in that film is implied rather than shown).
I want to see the bright candy-colors of the old school Batman in high def! I'd have already gotten it, but... well... camera...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Excellent Movie. I find myself pondering it still. The story was fantastic. Yes, the movie is very dark in multiple ways. Two I note here 1: The Joker is ruthless! 2: The movie explores the darker side of humanity and makes you think "Which would I choose?"
I haven't decided how old I want my boys to be before they seen this one. 13 is probably about right.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
It's packed to the gills, though, and makes sense as a complete story, with no really apparent excisions. There's a couple of not so thrilling moments (including one block of dialogue that's cringeworthy the way it comes out), a couple of places where the editing seems a bit off.
What may make or break it for you is something I've seen grumbled about repeatedly -- the Batvoice. Overrrrrdone.
(no subject)