You're arguing the wrong point here. I implied "just compensation" when I brought up eminent domain. I don't require eminent domain defined for me. The question was, is it possible - possible mind you - that you could disagree with the law if they were trying to "just compensation" something of yours that you wanted to keep despite its Constitutionality?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ninetydegrees
(no subject)
Let me put it another way: