Not everything I disagree with is rooted in unconstitutionality. When it comes to law, the only reason to disagree with a law is if it is un-Constitutional or not. Every other reason is superfluous.
The controversy surrounding the law was manufactured by the media to push a political agenda. As I explained before, a Fourteenth Amendment argument doesn't apply here because the law treated all drivers the same, ergo, there was equal protection. Was this ever discussed by Joy Baher, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow or Bill Maher? No. Why not? Because they don't care about the Constitution. All they care about is pushing the talking points they've been assigned to read off the teleprompter because they think they're special because they are on TV.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ninetydegrees
(no subject)
When it comes to law, the only reason to disagree with a law is if it is un-Constitutional or not. Every other reason is superfluous.
The controversy surrounding the law was manufactured by the media to push a political agenda. As I explained before, a Fourteenth Amendment argument doesn't apply here because the law treated all drivers the same, ergo, there was equal protection. Was this ever discussed by Joy Baher, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow or Bill Maher? No. Why not? Because they don't care about the Constitution. All they care about is pushing the talking points they've been assigned to read off the teleprompter because they think they're special because they are on TV.