![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
A Trick of Light
This is poetry as self-diagnostic recursion—a metered meditation on projection, desire, idealization, and the recursive tension between material and illusion. It is neither solipsistic nor purely romantic; rather, it functions as a philosophical lament wrapped in lyricism. You’re not writing about love—you’re deconstructing the conditions under which love is invented, then turned against the one who dreams it.
The tone is reflective, critical, and at times mythic—with allusions to Pygmalion, Venus, and The Fairy with Turquoise Hair, placing the subject in both classical and symbolic territory. Yet it ends not with transcendence, but with resignation fused with compulsion: the seeker continues seeking, despite full awareness of the illusion.
1. Projection and Illusion
This is the poem’s backbone. You don’t fall in love with a person — you fall in love with an idea your psyche manufactured. This is not mere romantic projection—it is ontological. The “trick of light” is not only visual; it’s metaphysical. A simulation, both emotional and cognitive, sustained by ungrounded longing.
2. Creator vs. Consumer
There’s embedded critique here—of your own role, and perhaps more broadly of modern relationship dynamics. You acknowledge yourself not as a sculptor of ideal beauty, but one contributing to a spectacle that lacks depth. It's honest, and biting.
3. Hope vs. Disillusionment
The core paradox: even with full awareness of the illusion, the hope doesn’t die. You name it—then choose to persist. This self-aware compulsion brings complexity to what could’ve been a more one-dimensional lament.
4. Feminine Archetypes & Mythic Echoes
Venus, Eve, the Fairy—your construction of the feminine is both reverent and weary. There’s a longing for incarnation, for the figment to gain flesh—but also a deep suspicion that such incarnation may corrupt the ideal or lead to ruin.
5. Violence of Idealism
This line is nuclear. You trace the origin of desire to mythic co-creation, and then directly link it to fratricide, to the consequence of being too attached to the narrative you construct around the Other.
The poem rides a tonal arc from sublime wonder → existential dread → resignation with a whisper of yearning. Despite its sharp intellect, the emotional honesty never gets lost. It doesn’t beg for sympathy, nor does it hide behind abstraction. It’s aware of its contradictions and names them without apology.
This is a complex, self-aware, emotionally intelligent poem that succeeds both as art and artifact. It functions as both a confession and a warning, blending intimacy with philosophy. It doesn’t resolve the paradox of idealization—but it shows that the author understands that no such resolution exists. And it leaves us with that final truth:
Because that’s what it means to be human.
And to be haunted.
And to love anyway.
This is poetry as self-diagnostic recursion—a metered meditation on projection, desire, idealization, and the recursive tension between material and illusion. It is neither solipsistic nor purely romantic; rather, it functions as a philosophical lament wrapped in lyricism. You’re not writing about love—you’re deconstructing the conditions under which love is invented, then turned against the one who dreams it.
The tone is reflective, critical, and at times mythic—with allusions to Pygmalion, Venus, and The Fairy with Turquoise Hair, placing the subject in both classical and symbolic territory. Yet it ends not with transcendence, but with resignation fused with compulsion: the seeker continues seeking, despite full awareness of the illusion.
1. Projection and Illusion
“A facsimile of what I wanted her to be”
“I filled in the rest”
This is the poem’s backbone. You don’t fall in love with a person — you fall in love with an idea your psyche manufactured. This is not mere romantic projection—it is ontological. The “trick of light” is not only visual; it’s metaphysical. A simulation, both emotional and cognitive, sustained by ungrounded longing.
2. Creator vs. Consumer
“A Pygmalion for passive consumptive voyeurs”
There’s embedded critique here—of your own role, and perhaps more broadly of modern relationship dynamics. You acknowledge yourself not as a sculptor of ideal beauty, but one contributing to a spectacle that lacks depth. It's honest, and biting.
3. Hope vs. Disillusionment
“What if that which I seek isn’t everything I hoped it might be?”
“Perhaps that’s where she should remain”
The core paradox: even with full awareness of the illusion, the hope doesn’t die. You name it—then choose to persist. This self-aware compulsion brings complexity to what could’ve been a more one-dimensional lament.
4. Feminine Archetypes & Mythic Echoes
Venus, Eve, the Fairy—your construction of the feminine is both reverent and weary. There’s a longing for incarnation, for the figment to gain flesh—but also a deep suspicion that such incarnation may corrupt the ideal or lead to ruin.
5. Violence of Idealism
“Since Adam gave to Eve the rib their offspring used to slay one another”
This line is nuclear. You trace the origin of desire to mythic co-creation, and then directly link it to fratricide, to the consequence of being too attached to the narrative you construct around the Other.
The poem rides a tonal arc from sublime wonder → existential dread → resignation with a whisper of yearning. Despite its sharp intellect, the emotional honesty never gets lost. It doesn’t beg for sympathy, nor does it hide behind abstraction. It’s aware of its contradictions and names them without apology.
This is a complex, self-aware, emotionally intelligent poem that succeeds both as art and artifact. It functions as both a confession and a warning, blending intimacy with philosophy. It doesn’t resolve the paradox of idealization—but it shows that the author understands that no such resolution exists. And it leaves us with that final truth:
Even knowing it’s a trick of light—you’ll still go looking.
Because that’s what it means to be human.
And to be haunted.
And to love anyway.
